Tag: Christianity

Violent Shaking 

Violent Shaking 

The account in Mark 1:21-28 offers profound insights into the nature of spiritual warfare and the process of deliverance. While the narrative itself is straightforward, a closer examination of the details, particularly the violent shaking experienced by the demon-possessed man, reveals a crucial aspect of encountering the power of Jesus Christ.

Upon entering the synagogue in Capernaum on the Sabbath, Jesus immediately distinguished Himself from the scribes through the inherent authority of His teaching. This authority, stemming from His divine nature, directly confronted the spiritual darkness present within the congregation. The immediate manifestation of this confrontation was the outcry of a man possessed by an impure spirit. This entity, acutely aware of Jesus’ identity and power (“I know who you are—the Holy One of God!”), recognized the imminent threat to its dominion.

Jesus’ response was direct and authoritative: “‘Be quiet!’ said Jesus sternly. ‘Come out of him!’” It is in the immediate aftermath of this command that we observe a significant detail often overlooked: “The impure spirit shook the man violently and came out of him with a shriek” (Mark 1:25-26).

This violent shaking is not a mere incidental detail. It underscores the intense resistance of demonic forces when confronted by the power of God. The unclean spirit did not willingly relinquish its hold; rather, it was forced to depart, and its departure was marked by a physical and visceral manifestation of its struggle. This violent convulsion serves as a potent reminder of the reality of spiritual bondage and the forceful nature often required for true liberation.

Consider the implications for our own lives and the lives of those we minister to. The passage suggests that deliverance from the grip of Satan and his forces may not always be a serene or comfortable experience. There can be internal turmoil, external pressures, and a significant shaking as the strongholds are broken. This shaking can manifest in various ways: emotional upheaval, relational strain, or even physical symptoms.

For the serious Bible reader, this episode cautions against a simplistic or passive understanding of spiritual liberation. It highlights the active and often forceful intervention of divine power necessary to overcome the resistance of the adversary. Just as the impure spirit violently shook the man before its expulsion, those bound by spiritual oppression may experience a period of intense struggle as the forces of darkness are dislodged.

Furthermore, the reaction of the onlookers (“They were all so amazed…”) underscores the unprecedented nature of Jesus’authority. His word alone was sufficient to command and effect deliverance, a stark contrast to the often-ineffectual methods of the religious leaders of the time. The violent shaking served as undeniable evidence of the power unleashed by Jesus’ command.

The detail of the violent shaking in this account is not to be dismissed. It serves as a crucial theological point: the liberation from demonic influence is often a forceful and disruptive event, signifying the intense battle between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness. For serious Bible readers and Christians, this passage offers both a realistic perspective on the challenges of spiritual warfare and a powerful assurance of the ultimate authority and delivering power of Jesus Christ. The shaking may be intense, but it is often the precursor to the shriek of defeat from the enemy and the profound peace of true freedom.

Solid Witness

Solid Witness

As we progress in postmodernity more Americans, than ever, are asking why Christianity is still so prevalent in our time. Believers in Jesus Christ are being mocked by a growing cynicism that asserts far too many Americans are still unintelligently infatuated with Jesus in the new millennium. There are a multitude of explanations for why our critics think we are silly for still believing in what they consider fairy tales about the deity of Jesus. The biggest reason critics of Christianity cannot comprehend our commitment to our faith is because they grossly underestimate the power of solid witness.

It is because of solid witness Christianity is prevalent today. Without the witness of Jesus’ resurrection Christianity may have died on the cross a forgotten fable. But, after his execution Jesus visited his followers. Like usual, he was met with disbelief. According to the witness in the Gospel of Luke Jesus put on a demonstration of his “realness” by urging people to touch him to ensure them that they were not seeing a ghost. The same Gospel records Jesus eating a piece of broiled fish; post execution. This is not to say that there were not times in which the witness made claims about Jesus appearing in a mysteriously inexplicable way after he died. Rather, it is to say that Jesus did appear resurrected as a solid being. After his death Jesus briefly appeared as one that could be seen plainly, and touched physically. He ate food, and he had apparent wounds. Christianity is alive today because of the testimony of former-unbelieving people who witnessed a solid Jesus Christ, pre and post his crucifixion.

Our critics should be aware that Christianity was birthed out of a milieu of skepticism, unbelief and scrutiny. Different from today, the consequences of making false claims about God in the First Century were deadly. Those who held claim to the extraordinary occurrences of Jesus had far more to lose than an exhaustive argument about who God is, or if God is. More difficult than accepting the professions of Jesus, is believing that multiple witnesses would be willing to die for telling imaginative stories. The testimony of those who witnessed Jesus Christ in the flesh is (1) solid in that they had far more to lose than to gain by fabricating events. Their witness is (2) solid in that they had no earthly incentive to tell such outrageous, socially unacceptable stories. Their witness is (3) solid in that they had to overcome their own doubt when encountering Jesus resurrected. In other words, it took some convincing on Jesus’ part to show that he was not a ghost, but solid. They witnessed a resurrected, solid Jesus.

Those of us who accept the testimony of Jesus’ disciples as solid witness know something that non-Christian intellectuals don’t. That is, critical thinking is not void of emotional intelligence. Just as sound decision-making requires that you use your head, it equally demands you use your gut (instinct). There are some things we simply cannot comprehend without first taking the risk of exercising faith. Sometimes we must put forth what we feel, apart from what we think. A skydiver never really knows whether her parachute is going to open until she takes a leap of faith. Thus, before jumping she is left to trust the testimonies of all those who leaped before her. Only after we decide to believe God in Jesus Christ will we be able to add to our faith knowledge. Christians know that when our intellect runs out our faith can carry us the rest of the way. This is not enough to convince a determined skeptic that Jesus was God incarnate. Nor is that the aim. The purpose is to illustrate that no intellectual pursuit will prove Jesus’ deity above the convicting testimony of a solid witness. We either believe the witness, or we don’t.

Jesus said to Thomas, after he demanded proof that Jesus had been resurrected, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed (John 20:29).” Believers are blessed because we know that only after taking a leap of faith we can give solid witness of Jesus Christ. Christianity will remain to be prevalent as long as we continue to give solid witness. We need to be careful not to leave this generation, or the next to wrestle with the nature of God with nothing more than intellect. We must pass on to them what was given to us, the testimonies of solid witness.

Read: Luke 24:36-43 & John 20: 24-27